DB entry for Swissbit X-86m.2 Series

[Cassiano.Silva]

Can you please add the drivedb_X-86m2.h file to the smartmontools DB?
It's a card series from Swissbit AG that contains several different part numbers.

The drivedb_X-86m2.h file contains the piece of code to be added to the smartmontools DB.
The smartctl-Swissbit-X-86m.2_Series.txt file contains an smartctl example output with following part number: SFSA020GM1AO1TO-I-6B-11P-STD.

[Christian Franke]

Comments from ticket #1800 also apply here.

[Cassiano.Silva]

I now modified the file to make the part number identification (row 2) more general for new P/Ns that may come in the future. TAB characters were eliminated. The file the was attached.

[Christian Franke]

smartctl-Swissbit-X-86m.2_Series.txt:

ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAGS    VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
196 Total_Spare_Block_Cnt   PO--C-   100   100   025    -    18102617143
213 Spare_Block_Cnt_Worst   PO--C-   100   100   025    -    9009365529
229 Total_Flash_Block_Erases-O--C-   100   100   001    -    44217
248 Remaining_Life          -O----   100   100   000    -    100
  9 Power_On_Hours          -O----   100   100   000    -    0
198 Uncorretable_ECC_Erros  -O-RC-   100   100   000    -    0
...
242 Total_Host_LBA_Read     -O--C-   100   100   000    -    0
215 Trim_Status             -O----   099   099   000    -    0
194 Temperature_Celsius     -O----   033   113   000    -    7459617
184 E2E_ErrCnt_Flash-SATA   -O-RC-   100   100   000    -    0
185 E2E_ErrCnt_SATA-Flash   -O-RC-   100   100   000    -    0

Please tell the swissbit firmware department that the attribute table shall be sorted by ID. This is long standing practice.

X-8x.txt:

  //"-v 243,raw48,Host_LBA_Write_Exp "

This attribute does not appear in the testcase.

[Cassiano.Silva]

Output from "smartctl -a" on a X-8x device

[Cassiano.Silva]

"smartctl-Swissbit-X-86m.2_Series.txt" is the output of the old file, which is no longer valid.
I attached a new one, which is the output from the new file.

Unfortunately, the wrong sorting in the output was observed only a certain time after FW release. Since the FW team is very busy with other projects, it was decided to fix it in a future FW release.

Indeed, this device family does not contain the attribute 243. I removed it from the code and attached it again.

[Cassiano.Silva]

Hello,
is the code I provided now included in the smartmontools database?