Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#545 closed enhancement (fixed)
Crucial MX200 SSDs drivedb.h regexp
Reported by: | R00kie | Owned by: | Christian Franke |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | Release 6.4 |
Component: | drivedb | Version: | 6.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I believe I may have found a glitch with the regexp used to identify Crucial's MX200 line of SSDs.
According to the information on Crucial's website and what my MX200 identifies itself with, the regexp probably needs to be corrected.
The regexp should have 250|500|1000 instead of 256|512|1024.
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
by , 10 years ago
Attachment: | mx200regex.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | → Release 6.4 |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Status: | new → accepted |
Type: | defect → enhancement |
Please attach a sample smartctl -x
output of such a drive.
The entry added in r4042 is IMO correct but probably incomplete. It was based on a sample output from an actual Crucial_CT1024MX200SSD1 (see database mailing list).
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Version: | → 6.3 |
---|
The reason that led me to suspect the regex might not be correct, is that of all the MX200 SSDs currently listed on MX200 series pdf flyer[1], none of them match "Crucial_CT(256|512|1024)MX200SSD[1346]".
In this case I suppose an entry for the (250|500|1000) models should be added to the regex list instead of modifying the existing one.
I'm attaching the output of 'smartctl -q noserial -x' of my MX200. Note that I have changed the regex in the drivedb.h that I'm using, so smartctl does not say that the drive is not in the database.
I have confirmed that the attribute id/names match with the information provided in the pdf linked in the database mailing list.
[1] http://www.crucial.com/wcsstore/CrucialSAS/pdf/product-flyer/crucial-mx200-ssd-product-flyer-letter-en.pdf
by , 10 years ago
Attachment: | MX200_smartctlx added |
---|
Regexp correction patch